Disappointed Pro Subscriber: Venice Is Pushing Me to Leave

Title: Add a high-quality open-source image generation model to Pro

Feature request

As a paying Venice Pro subscriber, I believe the included image generation pool needs a meaningful quality upgrade.

My request is not for unlimited access to commercial models such as ChatGPT Image or Grok. I am asking Venice to include at least one genuinely competitive, high-quality open-source image generation model in the standard Pro subscription, without additional credit costs per image.

In my experience, some of the current included models produce serious anatomical errors, including missing or malformed limbs, distorted hands and feet, and inconsistent body proportions. These problems make the results unreliable for demanding creative work, even when the images appear detailed at first glance.

Venice advertises a large daily image allowance, but quantity alone does not provide value when the available models cannot consistently produce usable results. Meanwhile, access to better models and newer capabilities increasingly depends on additional credits.

Competing services offer broad access to open-source image models within subscriptions at a similar price point. Venice Pro should provide a compelling reason for subscribers to remain, rather than requiring additional payments to obtain consistently good image quality.

Requested change: Include at least one high-quality, photorealistic open-source image generation model in Venice Pro, with image generations covered by the existing subscription allowance and no separate credit charge per image.

I value Venice and would prefer to remain a subscriber. I am asking for a practical improvement to the included product that makes the Pro subscription worth keeping.

Is this improvement being considered for the roadmap?