Another disappointed Pro subscriber here. I completely agree, and I think the problem goes beyond Chroma.
I pay $18 per month for Venice Pro, and increasingly I struggle to understand what makes this subscription worth keeping.
The problem is not that Venice refuses to give us unlimited access to commercial models like GPT Image or Grok. I am not asking for that. The problem is that the included image-generation pool itself is not good enough for the price we pay.
Venice advertises up to 1,000 images per day, but quantity means very little when the available models produce serious anatomical errors: extra fingers, malformed hands and feet, missing limbs, arms that turn into legs, and bodies with completely broken proportions. Chroma is supposed to be one of the best options available in the included pool, yet I have encountered precisely these kinds of failures. A detailed image is not necessarily a good image if the anatomy is fundamentally wrong.
Z-Image Turbo is fast and can be useful for casual generations, but speed is not the same as quality, and it does not meet my needs for more demanding photorealistic work. Since Venice promotes uncensored generation, the quality of the models available for that use case matters enormously. If Chroma is the only viable uncensored photorealistic generator included in Pro, that is a serious limitation.
What makes this especially frustrating is that Venice already has an uncensored Qwen model in its image editor. If that model produces better skin, anatomy and hands, why can it not also be made available in the Image Generation tab as part of the standard Pro pool? I am not demanding unlimited access to expensive commercial models. I am asking for at least one genuinely competitive open-source image generator included in the subscription I already pay for.
The pricing structure is another major problem. Every time a useful new capability or a better model appears, it increasingly feels as though access is pushed behind additional credit costs. We already pay a monthly subscription, yet getting the quality we actually need can mean paying again.
Video is an even clearer example. Pro includes only 100 monthly credits, worth approximately $1 at Venice's stated credit value. Depending on the model and duration, that may cover very little actual video generation. In practical terms, video does not feel meaningfully included in the subscription.
Meanwhile, Sogni offers a broad catalogue of open-source image and video models for around $20 per month, with many models included under its usage conditions. It has exceptions and paid premium models too, but the overall value proposition is very different. I can use Qwen Image 2512 for generation there, and my results have made me seriously question why I should continue paying for Venice.
I also have access to numerous open-source models through API providers. Simply offering access to open models is not enough to justify $18 per month. What should justify the subscription is a well-maintained, competitive catalogue, a good user experience, and included models that produce results worth using.
The most disappointing part is that I actually like Venice and would prefer to stay. But I increasingly feel that paying Pro subscribers are being offered a large daily image allowance instead of meaningful improvements in image quality, while better capabilities require additional payments. I cannot speak for Venice's intentions, but this is the experience that makes me feel that the needs of Pro subscribers are not being taken seriously.
My requests are straightforward:
Add the uncensored Qwen model, or an equivalent high-quality open-source model, to the standard Pro image-generation pool without additional per-image credit charges.
Improve the quality and reliability of the included models, especially anatomical consistency, hands, feet and limbs.
Provide a more useful monthly video allowance or substantially improve the Pro credit allocation.
Stop relying on the number of available generations as a substitute for actual image quality.
I am not asking Venice to give away every premium model. I am asking for a subscription that offers genuine value without constantly requiring extra payments to obtain usable results.
I would genuinely prefer to remain a Venice Pro subscriber. But if the included image-generation pool does not improve, I will have to cancel and move to a service that better meets my needs.
Please give paying Pro subscribers a concrete reason to stay.
Log in to comment and vote
Comments2
Aquamarine Savanna
Oct 21
Another disappointed Pro subscriber here. I completely agree, and I think the problem goes beyond Chroma.
I pay $18 per month for Venice Pro, and increasingly I struggle to understand what makes this subscription worth keeping.
The problem is not that Venice refuses to give us unlimited access to commercial models like GPT Image or Grok. I am not asking for that. The problem is that the included image-generation pool itself is not good enough for the price we pay.
Venice advertises up to 1,000 images per day, but quantity means very little when the available models produce serious anatomical errors: extra fingers, malformed hands and feet, missing limbs, arms that turn into legs, and bodies with completely broken proportions. Chroma is supposed to be one of the best options available in the included pool, yet I have encountered precisely these kinds of failures. A detailed image is not necessarily a good image if the anatomy is fundamentally wrong.
Z-Image Turbo is fast and can be useful for casual generations, but speed is not the same as quality, and it does not meet my needs for more demanding photorealistic work. Since Venice promotes uncensored generation, the quality of the models available for that use case matters enormously. If Chroma is the only viable uncensored photorealistic generator included in Pro, that is a serious limitation.
What makes this especially frustrating is that Venice already has an uncensored Qwen model in its image editor. If that model produces better skin, anatomy and hands, why can it not also be made available in the Image Generation tab as part of the standard Pro pool? I am not demanding unlimited access to expensive commercial models. I am asking for at least one genuinely competitive open-source image generator included in the subscription I already pay for.
The pricing structure is another major problem. Every time a useful new capability or a better model appears, it increasingly feels as though access is pushed behind additional credit costs. We already pay a monthly subscription, yet getting the quality we actually need can mean paying again.
Video is an even clearer example. Pro includes only 100 monthly credits, worth approximately $1 at Venice's stated credit value. Depending on the model and duration, that may cover very little actual video generation. In practical terms, video does not feel meaningfully included in the subscription.
Meanwhile, Sogni offers a broad catalogue of open-source image and video models for around $20 per month, with many models included under its usage conditions. It has exceptions and paid premium models too, but the overall value proposition is very different. I can use Qwen Image 2512 for generation there, and my results have made me seriously question why I should continue paying for Venice.
I also have access to numerous open-source models through API providers. Simply offering access to open models is not enough to justify $18 per month. What should justify the subscription is a well-maintained, competitive catalogue, a good user experience, and included models that produce results worth using.
The most disappointing part is that I actually like Venice and would prefer to stay. But I increasingly feel that paying Pro subscribers are being offered a large daily image allowance instead of meaningful improvements in image quality, while better capabilities require additional payments. I cannot speak for Venice's intentions, but this is the experience that makes me feel that the needs of Pro subscribers are not being taken seriously.
My requests are straightforward:
Add the uncensored Qwen model, or an equivalent high-quality open-source model, to the standard Pro image-generation pool without additional per-image credit charges.
Improve the quality and reliability of the included models, especially anatomical consistency, hands, feet and limbs.
Provide a more useful monthly video allowance or substantially improve the Pro credit allocation.
Stop relying on the number of available generations as a substitute for actual image quality.
I am not asking Venice to give away every premium model. I am asking for a subscription that offers genuine value without constantly requiring extra payments to obtain usable results.
I would genuinely prefer to remain a Venice Pro subscriber. But if the included image-generation pool does not improve, I will have to cancel and move to a service that better meets my needs.
Please give paying Pro subscribers a concrete reason to stay.
Olive Teacup
Oct 17
lo mismo