Skip to main content

FLUX Uncensored

Please bring back the older FLUX uncensored image generator, alongside the custom one.

It is great for generating NSFW images, but when it comes to males, it falls short massively compared to the previous one. Pony realism isn't great, either. It's very clear you're just generating from a small set of training data, so anything custom is almost impossible.

The older FLUX was one of the best things you introduced, and now it's gone. I've been paying for Venice for a while, I'd love to see it reintroduced.

Status: Rejected16 comments

Log in to comment and vote

Comments16

  • Black Woods

    •

    Feb 5, 2025

    I have been using Venice since Aug 2024, and can tell you the Flux Custom version you are referring to, is the EXACT same one as before, they just changed it to say custom instead of uncensored, and it’s not actually a model, it is the Flux uncensored LoRa that is being added to the base model, that is why you have to choose the weighting of it when you generate. There is a newer V2 of it that came out a while back that I had suggested months ago, but it doesn’t look as if it reviewed.

    This is the current LoRa being applied -

    https://huggingface.co/enhanceaiteam/Flux-uncensored

    And this is the Updated version that has many fixes -

    https://huggingface.co/enhanceaiteam/Flux-Uncensored-V2

  • Peach Squid

    •

    Feb 10, 2025

    Is it just me, or is it giving all the men vaginas?

    • Green Meerkat

      •

      Mar 13, 2025

      FOR REAL

    • Beige Mirror

      •

      Jun 15, 2025

      [deleted]
      • Jack

        Team•

        Jun 17, 2025

        If you’re seeing this on Flux Custom try Lustify or Pony. Those are our newer NSFW models

  • Emerald Squash

    •

    Feb 6, 2025

    Omg I know! Males won’t generate on either uncensored model (well, as of last week sometime). It did them really well in pony realism until recently. I was like wtf come on give us the D! hahahaha

  • Copper Corn

    •

    Feb 5, 2025

    Comment below is from me, I forgot I wasn’t logged in.

  • Rose Donut

    •

    Apr 4, 2025

    Nsfw image

  • Chocolate Drizzle

    •

    Apr 14, 2025

    No se suponía que Venice lo vendían como una IA sin censura?. Esto está capado como chat gpt

  • Salmon ZeroG

    •

    May 22, 2025

    Hi

  • Jack

    Team•

    Jun 22, 2025

    Please open a ticket up with some examples so we can help you out. [email protected]

    This model does require more detailed prompting but we have found output to be far better. 

  • Jack

    Team•

    Aug 6, 2025

    We’ll continue evaluating new image models as they come out. Right now Pony and Lustify will be the best options for NSFW images. Join our discord to be a part of the discussion:

    https://discord.gg/askvenice

  • An Anonymous User

    •

    Aug 8, 2025

    •

    Merged request

    •

    2 votes

    Awful uncensored image models

    FLUX custom - Used to be amazing about 7-8 months ago, would generate exactly what you asked for even down to the finest details with uncensored images involving both males and females. The images were photorealistic, and you could specify some absolutely bizarre scenarios, which it would produce no problem. As it stands now, it produces absolutely nothing for males other than cartoonist blobs with vague ball-like protrusions. I'm not the only one who misses the older version you had. At least include it as a separate version that you can switch between in the models own settings.

    Lustify - it's just… okay. Almost impossible to get something photorealistic, even when following prompt guides, and it's impossible to generate a foreskin for example, or specify a penis size. You just get the basic “default wang” I guess.

    Pony - everything you try to produce basically looks like a CG character in a fantasy world, even with style changes and longer prompts. 

    • Jack

      Team•

      Jul 21, 2025

      If you have any models you’d like to see added to the platform please let us know and we’ll evaluate it.